The new rules prohibit the painting of horns and putting ornaments on cattle, which are part of the traditional Pongal practices.
Pheba Mathew Priyanka Thirumurthy
Saturday, May 27, 2017 – 09:24
Months after Tamil Nadu witnessed massive protests following the Supreme Court ordered ban on jallikattu, the leaders of the state-wide demonstration questioned the Centre’s decision to ban the sale of cattle for slaughter at animal markets.
Karthikeya Sivasenapathy, a cattle rights and biodiversity activist lashed out at the Central government’s rules calling it a “political gimmick designed to create trouble”. The 45-year-old cattle breeder also said, “Now gau rakshaks across the country will have a free reign and will misuse these rules.”
The new rules, which define cattle as “bovine animal including bulls, bullocks, cows, buffalos, steers, heifers, and calves and includes camels” is not an outright ban on cattle trade or slaughter. But the notification will force cattle buyers to give an undertaking that the animals are not for slaughter but for “agricultural purposes”.
Sivasenapathy argues that the Centre’s rules, which are effective from Friday, can lead to the abandonment of cattle. “Banning slaughter will in no manner lead to conservation of the animal. This is completely unscientific. What will a poor farmer do now with his old cows?” In its lifetime, a cow can give birth to 18 calves. After that it has no value. These days, there is not enough fodder to even feed productive animals. How will a farmer afford to keep old animals? Even Gaushalas don’t have the resources for that. This won’t protect cows because people will just abandon the animals,” he says.
The new rules notified earlier this week list among the prohibited practices the shearing and painting of horns, as well putting ornaments and any decorative materials on animals.
The practice of painting the horns of bulls and decorating cattle with flowers and ornaments is part of the Pongal tradition in Tamil Nadu.
The new notification also prohibits the use of nose ropes or nose pegs to protect animals from injury and also bans cattle from being tethered on a short rope for an unreasonable period.
Speaking to TNM, P Rajasekaran, President of the Jallikattu Peravai Tamilnadu said he had not gone through the new rules, but noted, “Not able to paint horns for Pongal is still fine with us. But not being able to use nose ropes will become a problem as we need it for tying them at home and for other purposes. Other than that, I do not wish to comment on norms by the government.”
Sivasenapathy concurs with Rajasekaran over the use of the nose rope, stating, “If you can’t put a rope through the cow’s nose how can it be used in the field or even at home?” Like Rajasekaran, he welcomed the ban on painting horns, noting that it will prevent exposure to chemicals. He, however, added, “I believe this entire issue is being brought up to create controversy.”
This article, dated May 27, 2017, has been reproduced from the http:// Tha NEWS Minute.com. The original article can be accessed at : http://www.thenewsminute.com/article/new-cattle-slaughter-rules-sham-why-voices-jallikattu-are-upset-centre-62688
“A righteous person follows ahimsa or non-violence to any living being by thought, word or deed and possesses tolerance towards others with an unperturbed mind even if they are antagonistic.” – Bhagavad Gita
Of late, It has become a fad to ridicule Hinduism. The oldest and most tolerant religion which never professes propagation is at the receiving end from every Tom, Dick and Harry who wants to make a fashion statement.
It has reached such a state today that anything associated with Hinduism is branded as ‘backward’, ‘superstitious’, ‘illiterate’ or even ‘barbaric’. Similar traditions and customs followed by the religious minorities are encouraged under the garb of ‘minority rights’ (read secularism). The very same self-professed, know-all intellectuals are scared to open their mouth about the customs and traditions of the minorities for fear of incurring their wrath.
Ingrained with the virtue of tolerance, Hindus just tolerate any kind of abuse thrown at them. With no single God, no single scripture and no single path to follow, Hinduism gives its followers maximum freedom to follow their chosen path. This benign aspect, considered a boon to its followers, is now their bane. They have been conditioned to tolerate anything thrown at them. If at all they make any noise, the intellectuals paint the issue as ‘caste’ based. ‘Caste’ being taboo, Hindus become reluctant to associate themselves with the issue.
One of the major assaults on Hinduism in recent times, is PETA’s affront on Hindus’ relationship with the Cow. Unlike the Western world which views its cows as walking hamburgers, the cow is considered sacred to Hindus. Cow is worshipped as ‘Kamadhenu’, the God that grants all wishes. ‘Nandi’, a bull, is Lord Shiva’s companion and stands in penance overlooking Lord Shiva in all his temples. Most Hindus are vegetarian and those who are not do not eat beef. Being predominantly farmers, their major relationship with the animal world has been with cattle. Cows have been reared for milk and bulls/ oxen, their work companions.
Hindus celebrate several festivals throughout the year to honour their cattle. The most prominent among them being ‘Makar Sankranti’ celebrated all over India. It is celebrated as ‘Pongal’, the harvest festival, in Tamilnadu, Sri Lanka, Malaysia, Singapore, Maldives and by Tamils all over the world.
Honouring the Cow, including bulls, oxen and calves, is a part of all Hindu religious festivals. They are decked with colourful garlands, horns painted and brought to temples for puja. A puja is also done to the cow. During a house-warming ceremony, a Cow and a calf are the first ones that enter into the house, as Hindus believe that Cow is the mother of all Gods. Temples in South India have statues of their temple bulls. There are even temples built for bulls. Hindus also honour the cow by having some innocuous activities associated with the temple festivals like ‘Jallikattu’, ‘Eruthottam’, bullock cart racing, bull racing, cattle shows etc.
One such sport, ‘Jallikattu’, is conducted in the Indian states Tamilnadu, Karnataka and Andhra pradesh, during local temple festivals, and also during Pongal. This is a harmless humal-animal contact sport that is conducted as a part of the temple festivities and not an individual sport conducted for entertainment. It has over 4000 years of recorded history. The bull is usually let loose on the temple grounds. The ‘prize’, if it can be called that, is usually a towel tied between its horns. Unarmed sportsmen who get hold of the towel will be declared victor. If the bulls returns home – the bull usually finds its way back home by itself – with the towel intact, the bull is considered the winner. Almost every temple in the 13 districts, constituting the ‘Jallikattu belt’, of Tamilnadu have permanent structures called ‘Vadi’ or the ‘starting gates’ for the bulls, standing evidence to the fact that this was indeed a part and parcel of Hindu tradition.
This historic sport is now the target of a sinister campaign by PETA which seems to have some hidden agenda in getting the sport banned. PETA has succeeded in getting this traditional sport banned by taking the legal route. PETA has been throwing all kinds of wild allegations against the innocuous temple tradition. PETA has been vilifying the harmless sport as ‘barbaric’ and has been further misleading the public, majority of whom have never visited or seen a Jallikattu, by equating this to spanish bull fights. Unlike bull fights taking place in other parts of the world, where the bull is tortured and killed, in Jallikattu the bull is not harmed at all. The tamil name ‘Aeru Thazhuvudal’ translates to ‘Embracing the Bull’! That is the true spirit of the game. The sportsman tries to embrace the bull by its hump – trying to hold the bull by its horns, neck, leg or tail will lead to disqualification – for a maximum of about 5 to 10 seconds.
When travelling across the rural countryside of Tamilnadu, one would come across numerous statues of temple bulls built inside the temple premises. These statues are usually built about a year after the death of the temple bull. They usually sport the real horns of the bull, exhumed in an elaborate ceremony conducted after about a year. The Hindus worship these bulls as God – when alive and even after they die. Death of a temple bull is considered as a loss of a family member of the whole village. All the villagers gather and perform the last rites for the temple bull as they would do when their bretheren passes away. Religious and non-religious festivals like marriages are not celebrated for the next 16 days as the village goes into mourning.
To achieve its goal of getting this Hindu religious activity banned, PETA has resorted to character assasination of not just the sport, but also Hindus and Tamils. One of the major allegation by PETA is that this tradition is not associated with Hinduism at all! PETA says it is not associated with religious activities. If this was true, then why do all these temples have permanent ‘Vadis’ (bull starting gates)? If it is not a Hindu religious practice, then why do all temple festivals include ‘Jallikattu’ as a part of the festivities? Why do all the temple festivals include honouring the bull? Why are there ‘Temple Bulls’ in the first place? Why are the ‘Temple Bulls’ given the honour of starting the ‘Jallikattu’?
PETA which is an American organisation, according to their own admission, kills over 4 million innocent puppies and kitten every year. What right does such a mass murderer like PETA have to preach Hindus on what traditions they should follow and what they should not?
Article by Balakumar Somu. The author can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org